Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Author: agmg

August undefined, 2024

WebIn case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of mind and to avoid litigation penalty u/s.271 (1) (c) of the Act cannot be levied. WebIn this connection, in the case of Suresh Chandra Mittal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Hon'ble M.P. High Court in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal [2000] 241 ITR 124, wherein it was held that " The Revenue did not at all discharge the burden to prove that there was concealment of income by the assessee.

B. Damodar Vaman Baliga vs Jt. Cit on 2 August, 2005 - Indian …

Webproceedings are not conclusive. The decision in CIT vs. Suresh Chand Mittal(251 ITR 9) (SC) further fortifies the case of the assessee. In the present appeal, when the wrong claim/mistake was brought to the notice of the assessee, that too, during assessment proceedings itself (before passing the assessment order), the assessee paid the due taxes, Web1) "CIT v Suraj Bhan 159 Taxman 26 P & H - penalty cannot be imposed merely on account of higher income having been subsequently declared. In his case, the 7 ITA Nos. 858 to 863/Mds/2011assessee had filed the revised return showing higher income and gave an granary showtime online

Jayantilal Ambalal Chokshi, ... vs Department Of Income Tax

WebJul 26, 2001 · CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal – Supreme Court of India TG Team Income Tax - Judiciary Download PDF 26 Jul 2001 9,245 Views 0 comment Case Law Details … WebSir Shadilal Sugar and General Mills Ltd vs. CIT (1987) 168 ITR 705 (SC) CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) Even after proviso to explanation 1, voluntary surrender to buy peace penalty u/ s 271 (1) (c) can not be levied. Ramnath Jaganath vs. State of Maharashtra(1984) 57 STC 46,51 (Bom), WebMay 3, 2024 · ORIGINAL PDF. Manjit Singh v. Cit. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT (A)10, New Delhi, Dated 26.07.2024, for the … granary slices

No penalty on income disclosed in revised After receipt of …

Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs M:. Chandra Sekhar on 4 …

Webcase of SureshChandra Mittal vs. CIT (Supra), the Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that the assessment was made by the Revenue and once the assessing authorities had failed to take any objection in the matter of surrender of income made by the assessee in his revised return, the explanation that he had WebAfter going through the letter of the ITO, the CIT (Appeals) held that Lotus Mills Ltd. would get a heavy refund from the Income Tax Department and it would be in a position to … china\u0027s civilian army peter martinWebIndian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law china\u0027s chongqing municipality

"WebC.R. Nagappa vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 4 September, 1968. ... vs Asstt. Cit on 21 May, 2004. Warning on Translation. User Queries. income tax returns . tax extender. … " - Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Cit vs suresh chandra mittal

Dr.B.Chendhilnathan, Chennai vs Department Of Income Tax on 29 ...

Webcourt in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal(2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC), affirming the decision by the Madhya Pradesh High Court ( reported at 241 ITR 124 (MP)) wherein the returns admitting additional income filed beyond the time limit available for furnishing revised returns were not considered invalid on that score. Further, a similar issue, had WebMar 12, 2009 · Suresh Chandra Mittal, [2001] 251 ITR 9/119 Taxman 433, has upheld the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Suresh …

Did you know?

WebIn Suresh Chandra Goyal (Supra), Hon'ble High Court of Delhi observed: "59. Thus, when one party gives a security to the other, implicit in the said transaction is the … WebAug 12, 2024 · The assessee has relied on the following judgment. “Sale consideration offered for tax on receipt of notice u/s. 148 to buy peace of mind. Not proved by department that explanation of assessee was not bona fide Suresh Chandra Mittal relied SLP of dept dismissed In the case of CIT V/s. 1. Rajiv Garg 2. Siya Ram Garg 3. Sanjay Garg 4.

WebMar 18, 2024 · In Suresh Chandra Mittal's case (supra) the Court came out with an epoch-making ruling, viz., if an assessee files a revised … Webvi. CIT vs Suresh Chandra Mittal(2000) 241 ITR 124 (MP) 2.2. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The facts, in brief, are that a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was carried out at the business premises of M/s Etco Group as well as at the

WebMay 2, 2015 · In case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of … WebApr 24, 2015 · In case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of …

Webcit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax F: Deleration in Annexure v F: Applicability of GST F: Switching Over From Regular to Composition Scheme F: Input tax credit F: Transporter issuing builty required to take gst registration? F: Non Genration of E-way Bill or genration of Incorrect E-Way bill , Imp... granary sherwoodWebThe Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Suresh Chand Mittal, 251 ITR 9 (SC) held that in a case where the assessee originally filed return showing meager income, but after action u/s.132 in response to notice u/s.148, the assessee filed revised return showing higher income and the eventual assessments were based on such return, penalty … granary shenstoneWebJul 6, 2016 · The Hon'ble Supreme Court has in fact confirmed the order of Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT v. Suresh Chandra Mittal in which Hon'ble High Court had held that in this case the surrender was made after persistent queries made by the AO. Still, it was held by the Court that no penalty should be leived. granary sherwood wiWebcit vs suresh chandra mittal 251 itr 9 income tax income tax F: Deleration in Annexure v F: Applicability of GST F: Switching Over From Regular to Composition Scheme F: Input … granary sherwood menuWebSuresh Chandra Mittal (2001) 251 ITR 9 (SC) He also relied upon the decision of ITAT, Bangalore in the following cases: IT Appeal No. 3480 (Bang.) of 2004 in the case of V. Krishnamurty v. Income Tax Officer dated 31-3-2005, IT Appeal No. 178 (Panaji) of 2002 in the case of Asstt. CIT v. G.L. Acharya dated 1-4-2005. china\u0027s closed door policy what yearWebIn case of CIT vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal 251 ITR 9 (SC), Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that if the assessee has offered the additional income to buy peace of mind … granary schnitzel house restaurantWebNov 23, 2016 · The assessee also relied on the judgment of Honble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Suresh Chandra Mittal [251 ITR 9]. In the case relied up on by the assessee, the assessee has revised return of income under section 148 of the Act showing more income. Thereafter orders of the :: 7 :: ITA No.1450/Mds/2016 reassessment were … granary sound